Education informatization is the common trend of education reform and development in all countries in the world now. Application-oriented university is an important part of higher education system in China. It is an important measure to evaluate the degree of educational informatization construction in application-oriented colleges and universities to grasp the present situation of education informatization in China and improve the education informatization level. This study was based on the literature to form the basic indicators, combined with the actual situation of universities to determine the indicators at all levels of dimensions. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) was used to determine the weight of each index. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation method (FSEM) was used to construct an evaluation model for the degree of education informatization construction in applied colleges and universities in China. A medical college in Shanxi Province is taken as an example to make an empirical study on the development of education informatization. The research shows that there is a weak advantage in information construction and the highest score in human resources, indicating that the college has paid more attention to the introduction of talents in an all-round way in recent years, and the school is making great strides toward an application-oriented research university in terms of scientific research information resources, but at the same time there are delays in information disclosure. Therefore, it is feasible and effective to use mathematical modeling to evaluate the degree of education informatization in application-oriented colleges and universities, which is helpful to promote the implementation of new infrastructure and the further deepening of education informatization construction in colleges and universities.

1.李志河, 潘霞, 刘芷秀, 等. 教育信息化2.0视域下高等教育信息化发展水平评价研究[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2019, 37(6): 81-90. [Li ZH, Pan X, Liu ZX, et al. Research on the evaluation of higher education informatization development level from the perspective of educational informatization 2.0[J]. Journal of Distance Education, 2019, 37(6): 81-90.] DOI: 10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2019.06.009.

2.廖帅, 邓茜, 吕卉. 广西高校教育信息化分类评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 教育观察, 2023, 12(16): 52-55. [Liao S, Deng Q, Lyu H. Research on the construction of classification evaluation index system of higher education informatization in Guangxi[J]. Survey of Education, 2023, 12(16): 52-55.] DOI: 10.16070/j.cnki.cn45-1388/g4s.2023.16.015.

3.党建宁, 杨晓宏, 王馨晨. 教育信息化2.0下的高校信息化绩效评价模型和指标体系研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2019, 40(8): 45-52. [Dang JN, Yang XY, Wang XC. Research on performance evaluation model and index system of university informatization under education informatization 2.0[J]. E-education Research, 2019, 40(8): 45-52.] DOI: 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2019.08.006.

4.Aliyev R, Temizkan H, Aliyev R. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based multi-criteria decision making for universities ranking[J]. Symmetry, 2020, 12(8):1351. DOI: 10.3390/sym12081351.

5.陈艳君, 张勇飞. 基于模糊层次分析法的高校基层工作考核评价体系的研究与实践[J]. 现代职业教育, 2022(10): 73-75. [Chen YJ, Zhang YF. Research and practice of evaluation system of grass-roots work in colleges and universities based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Modern Vocational Education, 2022(10): 73-75.] https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ChlQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIwMjMxMjI2Eg94ZHp5ankyMDIyMTAwMjUaCDNmc2dqcHF0.

6.Dai L, Li J. Study on the quality of private university education based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Application in Engineering and Technology, 2016, 31(4): 2241-2247. DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-169064.

7.张月. 义乌市CC街道棚户区改造项目绩效评价研究 [D]. 杭州：浙江大学, 2022. [Zhang Y. Research on the performance evaluation of renovation of shanty towns in CC subdistrict office in YiWu city[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2022.] DOI: 10.27461/d.cnki.gzjdx.2020. 004563.

8.王宇. 基于AHP的模糊综合评价在药品工艺验证中的应用研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2022. [Wang Y. The research of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on AHP applicate in drugs process validation[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2022.] DOI: 10.26944/d.cnki.gbfju.2021.000932.

9.梁保松, 陈振, 曹殿立, 等. 模糊数学及其应用（第5版）[M]. 北京: 科学出版社. 2022. [Liang BS, Chen Z, Cao DL, et al. Fuzzy mathematics and its application (5th edition)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2022.].

10.梁晓彤, 徐践, 高超. 高校教育信息化评价指标体系探讨——以北京市高校为例[J]. 河北农业大学学报(农林教育版), 2014, 16(4): 17-21. [Liang XT, Xu J, Gao C. Discussion on the evaluation index system of higher education informationization -- A case study of colleges and universities in Beijing[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University (Agriculture & Forestry Education), 2014, 16(4): 17-21.] DOI: 10.13320/j.cnki.jauhe.2014.0112.

11.牛思琦, 马健. 高校教育信息化建设水平评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(4): 422-426. [Niu SQ, Ma J. Construction research of evaluation index system for the level of educational informatization construction in higher education institutions[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Social Science), 2022, 24(4):422-426.] DOI: 10.11717/j.issn.1673-1387.2022.04.16.

12.傅雷鸣, 陈一飞. 基于层次覆盖模型的高校绩效评价指标体系研究[J]. 微型电脑应用, 2021, 37(12): 81-83. [Fu LM, Chen YF. Research on the index system of university performance evaluation based on hierarchical coverage model[J]. Microcomputer Applications, 2021, 37(12): 81-83.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-757X.2021.12.023.

13.郝照. 基于“三通两平台”成效分析的区域基础教育信息化发展对策研究[J]. 西北成人教育学院学报, 2022(1): 93-98. [Hao Z. The strategies of informatization development in regional basic education based on the effect analysis of "three supplies and two platforms"[J]. Journal of the College of Northwest Adult Education, 2022(1): 93-98.] DOI: 10.20012/j.cnki.ISSN1008-8539.2022.01.016.

14.陈明选, 来智玲, 蔡慧英. 我国基础教育数字资源及服务: 现状、问题与对策[J]. 中国远程教育, 2022(6): 11-20, 76. [Chen MX, Lai ZL, Cai HY. China's basic education digital resources and services: status quo, problems and solutions[J]. Chinese Journal of Distance Education, 2022(6): 11-20, 76.] DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2022.06.008.