Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 36,2023 No.11 Detail

Evaluation of the rationality of prophylactic antibiotics in perioperative period for cesarean section before and after clinical pharmacists intervention based on entropy weight TOPSIS method

Published on Nov. 28, 2023Total Views: 1109 times Total Downloads: 456 times Download Mobile

Author: Nan LI Wei LIU Yan-Zhong ZHANG

Affiliation: Office of Clinical Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453000, Henan Province, China

Keywords: Antibacterial drugs Cesarean section Perioperative period TOPSIS Clinical pharmacist Rational drug use

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-4337.202306106

Reference: Li N, Liu W, Zhang YZ. Evaluation of the rationality of prophylactic antibiotics in perioperative period for cesarean section before and after clinical pharmacists intervention based on entropy weight TOPSIS method[J]. Journal of Mathematical Medicine, 2023, 36(11): 818-823. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-4337.202306106[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  By using entropy weight TOPSIS method, to evaluate the rationality of prophylactic antibiotics used in perioperative period of cesarean section before and after the intervention of clinical pharmacists.

Methods  Based on Guiding Principles for Clinical Application of Antibiotics (2015 edition), drug instructions, and related guidelines, rules for evaluation of prophylactic application of antibiotics in perioperative period of cesarean section were established based on entropy weight TOPSIS. Furthermore, the rationality of cesarean section cases in The Third Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University in the first quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2022 were evaluated.

Results  The proximity degree (Ci) between the evaluated cases and the optimal plan was not less than 0.6 increased from 4 cases (3.48%) to 38 cases (38%), with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Before and after the intervention of clinical pharmacists, the maximum entropy weight of the ten evaluation indexes was drug administration time, with the weights of 0.684 3 and 0.751 7.

Conclusions  Based on TOPSIS method of entropy weight, the rationality of the prophylactics antibiotics use in perioperative period of cesarean section can be quantitatively evaluated by synthesizing multiple indicators, and the effect of clinical pharmacists' intervention can also be evaluated in a practical way.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.王然, 冯欣. 美国妇产科医师学会《临产及分娩中抗菌药物的预防性使用》(2018版)解读[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2018, 16(12): 17-19, 52. [Wang R, Feng X. Interpretation from American College of Obstetricians: use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery[J]. Clinical Medication Journal, 2018, 16(12): 17-19, 52.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3384.2018.12.004.

2.中国药学会医院药学专业委员会妇产科药学学组, 中国妇幼保健协会药事管理专业委员会, 浙江省药学会医院药学专业委员会妇儿药学学组. 妇产科围手术期抗菌药物预防使用指导方案[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2021, 56(3): 250-256. [Gynecology and Obstetrics Pharmacy Group of Hospital Pharmacy Professional Committee of Chinese Pharmaceutical Association, Pharmaceutical administration professional committee of China Maternal and Child Health Association, Department of Gynecology and Pediatrics, Hospital Pharmacy Professional Committee, Zhejiang Pharmaceutical Society. Recommendations for clinical prophylactic antibiotics in obstetrics and gynecology during perioperative period[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2021, 56(3): 250-256.] DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2021.03.014.

3.曾东汉, 樊光辉, 丁朝飞, 等. 改进的熵权TOPSIS法在医院医疗质量综合评价中的应用[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2018, 35(2): 298-301. [Zeng DH, Fan GH, Ding CF, et al. Application of improved entropy weight TOPSIS method in comprehensive evaluation of hospital medical quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 2018, 35(2): 298-301.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:ZGWT.0.2018-02-039.

4.Chen RC, Jiang HQ, Huang CY, et al. Clinical decision support system for diabetes based on ontology reasoning and TOPSIS analysis[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2017, 2017: 4307508. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4307508.

5.胡章海, 杨万枝. 基于加权逼近理想解排序法的儿科利奈唑胺药物利用评价[J]. 中国药物警戒, 2022, 19(10): 1128-1131. [Hu ZH, Yang WZ. Assessment of usage of linezolid by a pediatric department based on weighted TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance, 2022, 19(10): 1128-1131.] DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.20210258.

6.胡静, 曹加. 基于熵权 TOPSIS 评价我院围手术期预防用抗菌药物的合理性[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2022, 31(6): 405-409. [Hu J, Cao J. Establishment and application of evaluation criteria for antibacterial drugs use in clean surgery based on entropy TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2022, 31(6): 405-409.] DOI: 10.19960/j.cnki.issn1005-0698.2022.06.008.

7.《抗菌药物临床应用指导原则》修订工作组. 抗菌药物临床应用指导原则(2015年版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015. [Working Group on Revision of Guiding Principles for Clinical Application of Antibiotics. Guiding principles for clinical application of antibacterial drugs (Edition 2015)[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2015.]

8.山东省疼痛医学会, 刘玉光, 张师前, 等. 妇科手术部位感染防控的专家共识(2020年版)[J]. 北京医学, 2020, 42(12): 1223-1230. [Shandong Pain Medical Association, Liu YG, Zhang SQ, et al. Expert consensus on prevention and control of gynecological surgical site infection (2020 version)[J]. Beijing Medical Journal, 2020, 42(12): 1223-1230.] DOI: 10.15932/j.0253-9713.2020.12.037.

9.卫生部.《剖宫产手术围手术期预防用抗菌药物管理实施细则》(征求意见稿)[S]. 2011. [Ministry of Health. Implementation Rules for the Management of Antibacterial Drugs for Prevention in Perioperative Period of Cesarean Section (Draft for Comments)[S]. 2011.]

10.麦露丝, 常惠礼, 麦艳芬, 等. 基于加权TOPSIS法的碳青霉烯类抗菌药物利用评价[J]. 海峡药学, 2022, 34(5): 121-123. [Mai LS, Chang HL, Mai YF, et al. Evaluation of carbapenems antimicrobial use based on weighted TOP-SIS method[J]. Strait Pharmaceutical Journal, 2022, 34(5): 121-123.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3765.2022.05.035.

11.王桂凤, 刘锐锋, 廖础欣, 等. 基于加权优劣解距离法的门急诊头孢克肟药物利用合理性评价[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析, 2020, 20(12): 1505-1508. [Wang GF, Liu RF, Liao CX, et al. Evaluation of application rationality of cefixime in outpatient and emergency departments based on the weighted technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution[J]. Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospitals of China, 2020, 20(12): 1505-1508.] DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2020.12.024.

12.陈小平, 何斐, 颜玉炳. 基于加权TOPSIS法的临床科室医疗质量综合评价[J]. 中国校医, 2019, 33(6): 463-465. [Chen XP, He F, Yan YB. Comprehensive evaluation of medical quality of clinical departments based on weighted TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Journal of School Doctor, 2019, 33(6): 463-465.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:XIYI.0.2019-06-028.

13.余应嘉, 叶淑芳, 邓燕芳,等. 基于加权TOPSIS法评价血必净注射液临床应用的合理性[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2021, 41(15): 1546-1550. [Yu YJ, Ye SF, Deng YF, et al. Evaluation of clinical application rationality of Xuebijing injection based upon weighted TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 2021, 41(15): 1546-1550.] DOI: 10.13286/j.1001-5213.2021.15.12.

14.黄蓓, 胡钟, 朱玲娜,等. 基于加权TOPSIS法的香丹注射液药物利用评价标准的建立与运用[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2020, 37(22): 2792-2796. [Huang B, Hu Z, Zhu LN, et al. Establishment and application of drug utilization evaluation standard of Xiangdan injection based on weighted TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy, 2020, 37(22): 2792-2796.] DOI: 10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.2020.22.019.

15.张树敬, 张燕, 胡晓文, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的医院抗菌药物临床应用管理质量评[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析, 2021, 21(12): 1520-1523. [Zhang SJ, Zhang Y, Hu XW, et al. Quality evaluation of hospital antimicrobial stewardship based on entropy weight-TOPSIS[J]. Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospitals of China, 2021, 21(12): 1520-1523.] DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2021.12.022.

Popular papers
Last 6 months