Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 36,2023 No.6 Detail

Analysis of dropping out causes of subjects in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy clinical research and construction of prediction model

Published on Jul. 03, 2023Total Views: 642 times Total Downloads: 168 times Download Mobile

Author: Hui WANG Xue-Fei SONG Chen-Ling YANG Yi WANG Ling-Zi LI Hui-Fang ZHOU Yin-Wei LI Jing SUN

Affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medi-cine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai 200011, China

Keywords: Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy Subjects dropping out Clinical research Clinical trials Prediction model

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-4337.202303027

Reference: Wang H, Song XF, Yang CL, Wang Y, Li LZ, Zhou HF, Li YW, Sun J. Analysis of dropping out causes of subjects in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy clinical research and construction of prediction model[J]. Journal of Mathematical Medicine, 2023, 36(6): 411-417. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-4337.202303027[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To retrospectively analyze the causes of the dropping out in subjects in thy-roid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) clinical research, and to establish a predictive model of subject dropping out, to provide the basis for the subject management in TAO clinical trials.

Methods  Data of 384 subjects participating in the TAO clinical trial in the department of ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong Uni-versity School of Medicine, from November 2017 to April 2021 were collected. Lasso regression was used for variable screening and construting a logistic regression prediction model, and the differentiation and calibration of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve validation model were drawn.

Results  A total of 384 sub-jects, of mean age (44.55±13.25) years, were 173 males (45.1%), 211 females (54.9%), and 53 subjects dropped out, with a dropping out rate of 13.8%. The main reasons for subject dropping out were untreated after enrollment, un-traced cause, refusal to follow-up, the impact of COVID-19, and unanswered phone calls. The results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis in the training set showed that treatment modality (OR=0.16, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.40, P<0.001), smoking (OR=0.19, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.78, P=0.04), diplopia score (OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.19 to 0.61, P<0.001), and source (OR=12.09, 95%CI 3.41 to 48.76, P<0.001) were independent predictors of subject dropping out. The area under curve (AUC) under the ROC curve in the validation set is 0.786, which indicates that the model built in the training set has good prediction ability, while the calibration curve shows good consistency in the validation set. Con-clusion  Applying the model established in this study to predict the dropping out of subjects in the upcoming TAO clinical reasearch, focusing on subjects with a probability of dropping out, providing warnings for problems that may lead to dropping out, and strengthening clinical research management training for researchers, can help reduce the subject dropping out rate and improve the quality of clinical research.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.韦传姑, 蔡颖, 陈大宾, 等. 临床研究中受试者脱落的影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2021, 38(5): 752-754. [Wei CG, Cai Y, Chen DB, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of participants drop-out in clinical study[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 2021, 38(5): 752-754.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2021.05.030.

2.钟潇琦, 汪钦林, 梁卉薇, 等. 抗抑郁药临床试验受试者脱落情况及影响因素[J]. 四川精神卫生, 2021, 34(5): 440-443. [Zhong XQ, Wang QL, Liang HW, et al. Analysis of participants drop-out in antidepressant clinical trials and related influencing factors[J]. Sichuan Mental Health, 2021, 34(5): 440-443.] DOI: 10.11886/scjsws20210225002.

3.Perros P, Krassas GE. Graves orbitopathy: a perspective[J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2009, 5(6): 312-318. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.61.

4.Wang Y, Smith TJ. Current concepts in the molecular pathogenesis of thyroid-associated ophthalmo-pathy[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(3): 1735-1748. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-14002.

5.McEvoy BW. Missing data in clinical trials for weight management[J]. J Biopharm Stat, 2016, 26(1): 30-36. DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2015.1094814.

6.Bernstein SL, Feldman J. Incentives to participate in clinical trials: practical and ethical considera-tions[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2015, 33(9): 1197-1200. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.020.

7.袁阳丹, 刘伟杰, 刘玉秀, 等. 多中心临床试验随机化竞争入组方式的探讨[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2020, 37(3): 335-339. [Yuan YD, Liu WJ, Liu YX, et al. Randomized competitive enrollment mode in multi-center clinical trials[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 2020, 37(3): 335-339.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:ZGWT.0.2020-03-004.

8.Vale CL, Cragg WJ, Cromarty B, et al. When participants get involved: reconsidering patient and public involvement in clinical trials at the MRC clinical trials unit at UCL[J]. Trials, 2018, 19(1): 95. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2471-4.

9.Suprin M, Chow A, Pillwein M, et al. Quality risk management framework: guidance for successful im-plementation of risk management in clinical development[J]. Ther Innov Regul Sci, 2019, 53(1): 36-44. DOI: 10.1177/2168479018817752.

10.孟盈, 周慧芳, 陆颖理. 甲状腺相关眼病流行病学和临床特征[J].中国实用内科杂志, 2015, 35(7): 566-568. [Meng Y, Zhou HF, Lu YL. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of thyroid related ophthalmopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine, 2015, 35(7): 566-568.] DOI: 10.7504/nk2015060203.

11.钟思思, 刘泽阳, 吴旭昇, 等. 甲状腺相关眼病患者生活质量下降相关因素分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2017, 17(2): 311-316. [Zhong SS, Liu ZY, Wu XS, et al. Influence factors for decreased quality of life in thy-roid-associated ophthalmopathy patients[J]. International Eye Science, 2017, 17(2): 311-316.] DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2017.2.30.

12.Nita M, Grzybowski A. Smoking and eye pathologies. A systemic review. Part II. Retina diseases, uveitis, optic neuropathies, thyroid-associated orbitopathy[J]. Curr Pharm Des, 2017, 23(4): 639-654. DOI: 10.2174/1381612823666170111095723.

13.汪云云, 陈松灿. 基于AUC的分类器评价和设计综述[J]. 模式识别与人工智能, 2011, 24(1): 64-71. [Wang YY, Chen SC. A survey of evaluation and design for AUC based classifier[J]. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 24(1): 64-71.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6059.2011.01.008.

14.李扬, 李竟翔, 王园萍. 基于AUC回归的不平衡数据特征选择模型研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2015(5): 10-15, 16. [Li Y, Li JX, Wang YP. Study on the feature selection method with the penalized AUC regression for the imbalanced data[J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2015(5): 10-15, 16.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2015.05.002.

15.解子惠, 张云雪, 王清, 等. 基于列线图构建护理专业学生非自杀性自伤风险预测模[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2022, 36(7): 615-620. [Xie ZH, Zhang YX, Wang Q, et al. Development of nomogram model for prediction of non-suicidal self-injury in nursing students[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2022, 36(7): 615-620.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2022.07.012.

Popular papers
Last 6 months