Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 36,2023 No.9 Detail

Construction of an index system for evaluating the quality of orthopaedic evidence-based research centered on the effectiveness of clinical problem solving

Published on Oct. 07, 2023Total Views: 1505 times Total Downloads: 507 times Download Mobile

Author: Guo-Xin HUANG 1 Qi-Long CAO 2 Hua TAO 3 Jia-Guo ZHAO 4 Qiao HUANG 5

Affiliation: Ying LIU6, Jin-Wei AI1, Deng-Ru Wang7,[binpei@hbmu.edu.cn]Bin PEI1 1. Department of Evidence-Based Medicine, Xiangyang No.1 People’s Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei Province, China 2. Qingdao Haier Biotech Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China 3. Department of Pharmacy, Zhengzhou Second Hospital, Zhengzhou 450015, China 4. Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China 5. Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China 6. Department of Nursing, Xiangyang No.1 People’s Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei Province, China 7. Yunnan Yanling Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Kunming 650224, China

Keywords: Evaluation system Delphi method Evidence-based orthopaedics

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-4337.202309104

Reference: Huang GX, Cao QL, Tao H, Zhao JG, Huang Q, Liu Y, Ai JW, Wang DR, Pei B. Construction of an index system for evaluating the quality of orthopaedic evidence-based research centered on the effectiveness of clinical problem solving[J]. Journal of Mathematical Medicine, 2023, 36(9): 680-688. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-4337.202309104[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To construct an index system for evaluating the quality of orthopaedic evidence-based research centered on the effectiveness of clinical problem solving.

Methods  Applying the structure-process-outcome theory, the quality evaluation index system of orthopaedic evidence-based research centered on the effectiveness of clinical problem solving was constructed, the weights of the indexes were determined, and the preliminary validation was carried out through the method of literature analysis, the semi-structured interview method, and two rounds of the Delphi method, in combination with the hierarchical analysis method.

Results  Fifteen experts completed two rounds of the Delphi expert consultation, which showed high ratings of expert authority and good coordination of opinions. 4 first-level indicators, 14 second-level indicators, 2 third-level indicators and 5 fourth-level indicators were eventually constructed. The results of the analytic hierarchy process showed an random index (RI) value of 0.882 and a consistend ratio (CR) of 0.006. Preliminary validation showed that the consistency of the reliability was plausible, and the scale design had a high degree of differentiation.

Conclusion  The orthopaedic evidence-based research quality evaluation index system centered on the effectiveness of clinical problem solving can quickly and objectively evaluate orthopaedic evidence-based research, identify and solve orthopaedic clinical problems, and lay the foundation for improving the quality of orthopaedic evidence-based research.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd. Evidence-based orthopaedics: a paradigm shift[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, (413): 9-10. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000079319.41006.44.

2.Harari J. Evidence-based orthopaedics or 'superstition in the pigeon'[J]. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol, 2010, 23(2): 150. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-08-12-0122.

3.艾金伟, 陶华, 赵嘉国, 等. 循证骨科学定义的系统评价及循证骨科学文献的可视化分析[J]. 医学新知, 2023, 33(3): 220-227. [Ai JW, Tao H, Zhao JG, et al. Systematic evaluation of evidence-based orthopedic definitions and visual analysis of evidence-based orthopedic literature[J]. New Medicine, 2023, 33(3): 220-227.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202306018.

4.Zhao JG, Zeng XT, Wang J, et al. Association between calcium or vitamin D supplementation and fracture incidence in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(24): 2466-2482. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19344.

5.Belavy DL, Diwan AD, Ford J, et al. Network meta-analysis for comparative effectiveness of treatments for chronic low back pain disorders: systematic review protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(11): e057112. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057112.

6.Chen P, Huang L, Ma Y, et al. Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injection for knee osteoarthritis: a summary  of meta-analyses[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1): 385. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1363-y.

7.彭亦良. 循证医学对骨科临床实践的启示与哲学反思[J]. 华西医学, 2014, 29(2): 365-367. [Peng YL. Insights and philosophical reflections on evidence-based medicine for orthopaedic clinical practice[J]. West China Medical Journal, 2014, 29(2): 365-367.] DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.20140112.

8.唐飞舸. 对循证临床决策模式的质疑与反思[J]. 医学与哲学, 2015, 36(22): 76-79. [Tang FG. Question and reflection on evidence-based clinical decision-making mode[J]. Medicine & Philosophy, 2015, 36(22): 76-79.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:YXZL.0.2015-11-028.

9.陈磊, 艾金伟, 喻会, 等. 自体单个核细胞治疗股骨头坏死有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(4): 446-456. [Chen L, Ai JW, Yu H, et al. Efficacy and safety of autologous mononuclear cells transplantation in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysis[J]. Cinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2021, 21(4): 446-456.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202010143.

10.黄幼芳, 江月卿, 叶励新. 结构-过程-结果护理管理模式对急性脑梗死合并糖尿病患者的影响[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2023, 14(12): 168-172. [Huang YF, Jiang YQ, Ye LX. Influence of structure-process-result nursing management mode in patients with acute cerebral infarction complicated with diabetes[J]. China Health Standard Management, 2023, 14(12): 168-172.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2023.12.036.

11.熊春红, 孙庭婷, 方亮, 等. 基于结构-过程-结果理论为框架在手术室护理管理中的应用研究[J]. 中国医学创新, 2019, 16(26): 94-97. [Xiong CH, Sun TT, Fang L, et al. Application research based on structure-process-result theory in operating room nursing management[J]. Medical Innovation of China, 2019, 16(26): 94-97.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2019.26.025.

12.叶莹, 姬艳芳, 张璐, 等. 运用Likert 5级评分法对免疫规划互联网+培训的效果评价[J]. 河南预防医学杂志, 2019, 30(9): 701-703. [Ye Y, Ji YF, Zhang L, et al. Using likert 5-level scoring method to evaluate the effect of Internet + training in immunization program[J]. Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2019, 30(9):701-703.] DOI: 10.13515/j.cnki.hnjpm.1006-8414.2019.09.019.

13.陆芳. TI-RADS 3~5级评分法与超声弹性成像分级法对甲状腺良恶性结节诊断价值的对比研究[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(12): 1665-1667. [Lu F. Comparative study of the value between TI-RADS scoring and ultrasound elastography grading in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical College, 2016, 41(12): 1665-1667.] DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.12.040.

14.卢红梅, 任笑寒, 买轩, 等. 安宁疗护专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2023, 29(14): 33-36. [Lu HM, Ren XH, Mai X, et al. Construction of a core competence evaluation index system for hospice nurse specialists[J]. Journal of Qilu Nursing, 2023, 29(14): 33-36.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2023.14.010.

15.廖若彤, 李敏清, 林美珍, 等. 中医院校护理硕士专业学位研究生过程性评价和多元考核体系的构建[J]. 现代临床护理, 2022, 21(1): 58-64. [Liao RT, Li MQ, Lin MZ, et al. Development of a process evaluation and multiple assessment system for master degree nursing students in colleges and universities of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Modern Clinical Nursing, 2022, 21(1): 58-64.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2022.01.010.

16.任玉兰, 吴曦, 梁繁荣. 基于循证医学针灸临床研究证据评价体系的初步构建[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2012, 39(2): 205-209. [Ren YL, Wu X, Liang FR. Clinical research on acupuncture based on evidence-based medicine preliminary construction of evidence evaluation system[J]. Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2012, 39(2): 205-209.] DOI: 10.13192/j.ljtcm.2012.02.18.renyl.010.

17.张海燕, 李艳鑫. Stanford B型主动脉夹层胸主动脉腔内修复围术期护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(13): 2340-2346. [Zhang HY, Li YX. Construction of perioperative nursing quality evaluation index system for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of stanford type B aortic dissection[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2023, 37(13): 2340-2346.] DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.13.009.

18.马玉, 惠文, 邓可, 等. 缺血性脑卒中中成药综合评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(9): 1055-1061. [Ma Y, Hui W, Deng K, et al. A study on the construction of the comprehensive evaluation indicator system of Chinese patent medicines for ischemic stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Base Medicine, 2022, 22(9): 1055-1061.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202204039.

19.Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry[J]. Stat Methods Med Res, 1998, 7(3): 301-317. DOI: 10.1177/096228029800700306.

20.杨奇明, 林坚. 组内相关系数: 定义辨析、估计方法与实际应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2013, 40(5): 509-515. [Yang QM, Lin J. Intraclass correlation coefficient: definitions, estimation and applications[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2013, 40(5): 509-515.] DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2013.05.007.

21.Bhandari M. Evidence-based orthopedics[M]. United States of America: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

22.张德强, 张锐, 宫福良. 骨科循证医学[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2014. [Zhang DQ, Zhang R, Gong FL. Orthopaedic evidence-based medicine[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2014.]

Popular papers
Last 6 months