Effects of laryngeal mask airway ventilation mode on patients with gynecological laparoscopic surgery

Published on Aug. 30, 2023Total Views: 411 times Total Downloads: 166 times Download Mobile

Author: Yi LIN ¹ Wen-Wen DU ²  Jun-Lu WANG ²

Affiliation: 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Wenzhou Third Clinical College, Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou People’s Hospital), Wenzhou 325099, Zhejiang Province, China 2. Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325015, Zhejiang Province, China

Keywords: Gynecological laparoscopic Laryngeal mask airway Volume controlled ventilation Pressure controlled ventilation

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-4337.202304130

Reference: Lin Y, Du WW, Wang JL. Effects of laryngeal mask airway ventilation mode on patients with gynecological laparoscopic surgery[J]. Journal of Mathematical Medicine, 2023, 36(8): 609-613. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-4337.202304130[Article in Chinese]  Copied

Abstract
Full-text
References

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of volume controlled ventilation (VCV) mode and pressure controlled ventilation (PVC) mode on respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, blood gas analysis and gas exchange under the condition of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Methods A total of 60 gynecological laparoscopic patients admitted to Wenzhou People’s Hospital from March 2022 to July 2022 were selected and divided into VCV group (30 cases) and PCV group (30 cases). Arterial blood was collected for blood gas analysis at 5 mins after LMA insertion (T1), 15 mins after LMA insertion (T2) and 15 mins after pneumoperitoneum insertion (T3), and respiratory mechanical parameters were monitored and recorded in both groups.

Results At T1 and T2, the peak airway pressure and plateau pressure in VCV group were significantly higher than those in PCV group (P<0.05). Compared with VCV group, PaO₂ in arterial blood in PCV group was significantly higher at T2 and T3 (P<0.05). Compared with VCV group, PaCO₂ in PCV group was obviously lower at T1 and T2 (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in PaCO₂ between two groups at T3 (P>0.05). Compared with VCV group, PetCO₂ concentration in PCV group was significantly lower at T2 and T3 (P<0.05).

Conclusion Both VCV and PCV are suitable for gynecologic laparoscopy, however, the airway pressure of PCV is significantly lower than that of VCV, and using PCV would be helpful in preventing airway pressure injuries in the lung.

Full-text

Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download

References

1.刘秀, 孔贯详, 季小青, 等. 不同CO2气腹压力对腹腔镜疝修补术老年患者认知功能及呼吸指标的影响[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2022, 31(8): 698-701. [Liu X, Kong GX, Ji XQ, et al. Effects of different CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure on cognitive function and respiratory indexes in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair[J]. Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery, 2022, 31(8): 698-701.] DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.02E022052.

2.陈海亭, 孟庆香, 刘雯,等 . 妇科腹腔镜手术腹膜超微结构损伤与术后肩痛的相关性[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27(2): 139-142. [Chen HT, Meng QX, Liu W, et al. Association between peritoneal ultrastructure damage and postoperative shoulder pain in gynecological laparoscopy[J]. Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, 2022, 27(2): 139-142.] DOI: 10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2022.02.139.

3.秦蕊, 赵娜, 郭蕾, 等. 三种喉罩在妇科腹腔镜手术气道管理中的应用效果[J]. 宁夏医科大学学报, 2023, 45(1): 33-36. [Qin R, Zao N, Guo L, et al. Application of three kinds of laryngeal mask in air way management of gynecological laparoscopic surgery[J]. Journal of Ningxia Medical University, 2023, 45(1): 33-36.] DOI: 10.16050/j.cnki.issn1674-6309.2023.01.007.

4.Han J, Hu Y, Liu S, et al. Volume-controlled ventilation versus pressure-controlled ventilation during spine surgery in the prone position: a meta-analysis[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2022, 78: 103878. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103878.

5.Rietveld PJ, Snoep JWM, Lamping M, et al. Mechanical power differs between pressure-controlled ventilation and different volume-controlled ventilation modes[J]. Crit Care Explor, 2022, 4(8): e0741. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000741.

6.陈逸斐, 何安东, 李雅兰. 合并OSAHS、重度PH的病态肥胖Prader-Willi综合征患儿腹腔镜减重手术麻醉管理1例[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2020, 6(4): 276-280. [Chen YF, He AD, Li YL. Anesthesia management for morbidly-obese children with Prader-Willi syndrome complicated with OSAHS and severe PH during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: one case of report[J]. Chinese Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Disease (Electronic Edition), 2020, 6(4): 276-280.] DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2020.04.016.

7.Lee JM, Lee SK, Rhim CC, et al. Comparison of volume-controlled, pressure-controlled, and pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation during robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the Trendelenburg position[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2020, 17(17): 2728-2734. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.49253.

8.孙树俊, 姜艳华, 刘海梅, 等. Trendelenburg体位人工气腹对压力控制通气预设气道压改变引起呼吸力学指标变化的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(2): 209-211, 215. [Sun SJ, Jiang YH, Liu HM, et al. Effect of Trendelenburg position and artificial pneumoperitoneum on change of respiratory mechanics indexes due to change of preset airway pressure in PCV[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2018, 34(2): 209-211, 215.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2018.02.012.

9.Vali P, Laskminrusimha S. Laryngeal mask airway: an alternate option for all phases of neonatal resuscitation[J]. Pediatr Res, 2022, 92(3): 626-628. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01917-5.

10.Schick V, Dusse F, Eckardt R, et al. Comparison of volume-guaranteed or -targeted, pressure-controlled ventilation with volume-controlled ventilation during elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(6): 1276. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061276.

11.Arvizo C, Mehta ST, Yunker A. Adverse events related to Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic surgery: recommendations and review of the literature[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 30(4): 272-278. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000471.

12.Monjezi M, Jamaati H. The effects of pressure- versus volume-controlled ventilation on ventilator work of breathing[J]. Biomed Eng Online, 2020, 19(1): 72. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00815-x.

13.王娜, 王金国, 朱亚香, 等. 妇科腹腔镜手术中应用Supreme喉罩压力控制通气与容量控制通气的比较[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2015, 19(9): 1572-1574. [Wang N, Wang JG, Zhu YX, et al. Comparison of pressure controlled ventilation and volume controlled ventilation with Supreme laryngeal mask in gynecological laparoscopic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis, 2015, 19(9): 1572-1574.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:ZSZD.0.2015-09-052.

14.Jeon WJ, Cho SY, Bang MR, et al. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2011, 60(3): 167-172. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2011.60.3.167.

15.郭锐, 钟茂林, 叶军明, 等. 腹腔镜二氧化碳气腹对全凭静脉麻醉中Narcotrend指数的影响[J]. 广东医学, 2018, 39(14): 2143-2146. [Guo R, Zhong ML, Ye JM, et al. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on the Narcotrend index in laparoscopic surgery with total intravenous anesthesia[J]. Guangdong Medical Journal, 2018, 39(14): 2143-2146.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2018.14.014.

16.Arboleda A, Amado L, Rodriguez J, et al. A new protocol to compare successful versus failed patients using the electromyographic diaphragm signal in extubation process[J]. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2021, 2021: 5646-5649. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629815.

17.刘彬彬, 余革, 温晓晖, 等. 超声监测气管内全麻患者人工气腹下膈肌移动度和肺不张[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(12): 1984-1988, 1992. [Liu BB, Yu G, Wen XH, et al. Ultrasound monitoring of diaphragmatic mobility and atelectasis in artificial pneumoperitoneum in patients with general anesthesia[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2019, 35(12): 1984-1988, 1992.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.12.027.